Thursday, February 14, 2013

Why 3x5 Geomorphs?

Andrew of Fictive Fantasies, who has coined the phrase Prokopian, has commented:
I think these geomorphs are cool (obviously, as I'm making some.) I want to note, however, I don't have a problem with the regular geomorphs. I look at this map I did with the Dungeonmorph Dice fonts, for example. I did some in Word and Photoshop to touch it up, but the end result was evocative and cool. My players enjoyed it.
The said file is, indeed, very cool. Like Andrew, I love geomorphs. All one has to do is go over to Dave's Mapper and click on FrDave to see how much effort I have put into the concept, and how cool the outcome can be.

However, as someone who has regularly run game sessions with players who like to wander all over the place and as someone who has attempted to put together a module for general consumption, I sometimes struggle with making those geomorphs make sense. I also say this in context of the whole "the first level of a megadungeon is boring" meme.

When I was writing The Slave Pits of Abhoth, I really struggled to come up with a map that spoke to me. I used several methods to try and generate that creative spark and nothing really satisfied. I then happened upon the idea of the 3x5 geomorph and it unlocked all that creative potential that was the initial idea of the Slave Pits.

Since then, I have found the whole concept to be truly liberating in terms of adventure writing. When I get to play around like this:

I can't help myself, the creative juices just begin to flow and the dungeons that this process produces are just better than the ones I used to produce using other methods. Therefore, I am trying to share my enthusiasm in hopes that my success will lead to others having success at overcoming the whole "megadungeons are boring" thing.

As such, here are four of my most recent 3x5s:


Roger G-S said...

What's new about your stuff is not the 3x5 dimensions but letting go the "2 evenly spaced exits on each side" graph paper crutch. They could as easily be 4x4, or even different polygons.

FrDave said...

True. I chose 3x5 index card because they are so readily available and easy to store.

Andrew said...

These really are cool. =)

One thing that I am doing is to put a light grid on it, lettered and numbered, and an ID number on the card itself. That way, instead of having to put numbers on, you could put in "F2 B1 Pool is blood 1' deep" or something like that.

As you use these, do you plan to scan yours in and arrange and photoshop them there? How do you take it from something on paper to something in a .pdf?

Andrew said...

I have also been trying to stick to the 3x5 idea, so I put 4 entries on each; my photoshop template has little guides to help me get the doors line up.

This example is great for demonstrating that it is not the point to make sure they can all fall in lockstep, generated in a different size. Instead, create bits and bobs and stitch them together however they'll fit.

That changes how I see the project, and it's pretty neat.

FrDave said...

I scan all the cards into Photoshop, so I have both an analog and digital file of each. I play with the actual cards (as above) and then take a picture (as above) and then I stitch it together digitally by importing all the digital files into one big Photoshop file, using the photo as a guide. From there, I can either use it as is or make it into a vector file with Illustrator.

Anonymous said...

Nice thing about the 3x5 is they can be vertical or horizontal and avoid that packed block look common with geomorphs.